This book is bordering on simple rants of a paranoid man. After spending months studying for the LSAT's I'm just seeing a long list of logical fallacies which are really unacceptable for a man trying to become the President of the United States. His new thing is attacking arguments/stances based on our consensus on the "evil" of those stating said argument/stance. This is a CLEAR logical fallacy as it doesn't actually criticize the argument but instead relies on an emotional response from the reader when the name of the "evil" person is mentioned.
Simply ridiculous, 25 pages in, dreading the next 300 +
Also, no citations, how can this even be possible?
Simply ridiculous, 25 pages in, dreading the next 300 +
Also, no citations, how can this even be possible?
